Table of Contents
When the “slash career” trend first took off, it sounded liberating: designer / developer, accountant / yoga teacher, engineer / podcaster. That second identity after the slash represented something your main job couldn’t give you — a space that was yours, free from company politics and someone else’s priorities.
A year or two in, a lot of people describe the same thing: “I don’t know why, but it’s more exhausting than my actual job.”
TL;DR
Side hustles burn people out when the original motivation gets replaced by external pressure — follower counts, income targets, output frequency. What started as breathing room becomes another obligation. Knowing what your side hustle is actually for is the only way to keep it from becoming a second job you didn’t sign up for.
What Side Hustles Were Solving in the First Place
Self-Determination Theory, a framework in psychology, identifies three core psychological needs:
- Autonomy: feeling like your actions are genuinely chosen, not coerced
- Competence: feeling capable and like you’re growing
- Relatedness: feeling connected to other people or to something meaningful
Many people develop side projects because their main job isn’t meeting one of these. Work with no autonomy. Work that offers no visible growth. Work that’s technically fine but feels disconnected from anything that matters.
The side hustle, at first, fills the gap.
Why It Gradually Stops Working
The problem is how side projects tend to evolve.
At the start, it’s a space where you can experiment without stakes. You write because you want to write. You teach because you find the subject interesting. You take on a project because it sounds fun. The autonomy is high, so even if it takes a lot of time, it doesn’t feel heavy — you chose it.
Over time, the side hustle starts growing its own institutional structure:
- Posting schedules (because the algorithm rewards consistency)
- Revenue targets (because “if I’m doing this I should at least be making something”)
- Comparisons to peers in the same space (because you can now see other people’s numbers)
At this point, what used to generate autonomy is now externally driven. You’re not writing because you want to — you have to keep the schedule. You’re not teaching because you enjoy it — you need to maintain enrollment. The autonomy is gone but the workload doubled.
Of course it’s exhausting.
Different Types of Side Hustles, Different Ways of Burning Out
Escape-motivated: The main job is suffocating, and the side project is an exit. This works until it doesn’t — because if the underlying problem at work isn’t addressed, the side project gradually absorbs the same pressure, and you end up stressed on two fronts instead of one.
Income-motivated: The goal is clear, the boundary-setting is easier. You know when you’ve hit your target, and you can stop there. The risk is cumulative frustration if income stays low for a long time.
Self-actualization-motivated: The hardest to sustain but potentially the most genuinely satisfying. The problem is that “self-actualization” has no defined finish line — it expands to fill whatever space you give it. But if you’re genuinely moving in a direction you care about, the meaning tends to outlast the fatigue.
Questions to Diagnose What’s Going Wrong
If this never made any money, would you still do it? If the answer is no, it’s a second job. Treat it like one — with boundaries, rest, and finite investment.
After you work on it, do you feel more energized or more depleted? If consistently the latter, the current form isn’t working, regardless of what it used to feel like.
When did you last actually enjoy the process? Loss of playfulness is usually the first signal that obligation has replaced genuine interest.
A Side Project Doesn’t Have to Be Productive
This sounds like heresy in a productivity culture, but it might be the most important point: if your side project exists to fill a gap your job doesn’t fill, its job is to fill that gap — not to become another revenue stream.
The gap can be filled without a YouTube channel, without a Substack, without an income. A private blog, an interest group you join, a skill you learn purely for the sake of it. All of these count.
What matters is whether that space is helping you stay a fuller version of yourself than your job allows.
References
🇺🇸 English
There's this pattern that comes up again and again in conversations with people who've built something on the side — a blog, a freelance practice, a YouTube channel. They started it with a kind of energy their day job didn't give them. And somewhere along the way, it started feeling heavier than the day job itself.
That's not a coincidence, and it's not about willpower.
The "slash career" concept — designer slash developer, engineer slash podcaster — was supposed to represent a second identity. Something yours, outside the org chart and the performance reviews. Something you actually chose.
The problem is what happens to that "something you chose" over time.
Psychology has a useful framework called Self-Determination Theory. It identifies three things humans genuinely need to feel good about what they're doing: autonomy — the sense that you chose this, not that it was imposed on you; competence — the feeling that you're growing; and relatedness — feeling connected to people or to something that actually matters. Most side projects get started because a main job is failing on one of those fronts. No autonomy at work. No visible growth. Technically fine job that feels weirdly hollow. The side project fills that gap.
Here's where it goes sideways.
In the beginning, you have high autonomy. You write when you want to write. You experiment because it sounds interesting. Even if it takes hours, it doesn't feel draining — because you chose it. That choice is the whole point.
But then the side project starts developing its own rules. Post on a schedule because the algorithm rewards consistency. Hit a revenue target because "if I'm spending this much time on it, I should at least be making something." Start comparing numbers with peers in the same space. Suddenly the thing that was supposed to give you autonomy is being run by external pressure. You're not writing because you want to — you have to keep the schedule. You're not teaching because you find it interesting — you need to keep enrollment up.
The autonomy disappeared. The workload didn't. Of course it's exhausting.
How this plays out depends on why you started in the first place. If your main job is suffocating and the side project is your planned exit, that structure works — until it doesn't. If you never actually fix what's wrong at work, the side project gradually absorbs the same pressure, and you end up stressed on two fronts instead of one.
If you started for income, it's actually more stable than it sounds. The goal is defined, the finish line is visible. The main risk is slow-burning frustration if the money stays low for a long time.
If you started for something like self-actualization — genuinely moving in a direction you care about — that's the hardest to sustain but potentially the most satisfying. The tricky part is that this kind of goal has no finish line. It expands to fill whatever space you give it. Which means without intentional structure, it just keeps growing.
A few questions worth sitting with honestly.
If this never made any money, would you keep doing it? If the answer is no, that's fine — but it means you have a second job. Treat it like one, with real boundaries and finite investment.
After you work on it, do you feel more energized or more depleted? Consistently depleted is a signal the current form isn't working, regardless of what it used to feel like.
And when did you last genuinely enjoy the process? Loss of playfulness is usually the first thing to go when obligation has quietly replaced actual interest.
Here's the part that sounds like heresy in a productivity-obsessed culture: a side project doesn't have to be productive.
If the whole point is to fill a gap your job doesn't fill, then filling that gap is the win. You don't need a YouTube channel to do that. You don't need a Substack. A private blog, a skill you're learning purely for the sake of it, an interest group you joined because you were curious — those all count. What matters is whether that space is helping you stay a fuller version of yourself than your job alone allows.
So before you stress about your content calendar or your growth metrics, it might be worth asking a simpler question: is this thing still yours?
Three things to take away. First: side hustles burn people out when external pressure replaces internal motivation — when "I want to" quietly becomes "I have to." Second: the type of side hustle changes how it fails, but the failure mode is usually the same — autonomy drops while the workload stays. And third: a side project that doesn't produce income or audience growth isn't failing. If it's keeping you more whole, it's doing exactly what it was supposed to do.
🇹🇼 中文
斜槓讓人累,不是因為你做太多事,而是因為你不知不覺把它變成了另一份正職。
「斜槓」這個詞剛流行的時候聽起來很性感——一個人,多重身份,自由選擇的人生。但做了一兩年之後,很多人說的話變成:「不知道為什麼,比上班還累。」
這到底是怎麼回事?
---
先講為什麼斜槓在一開始吸引人。心理學有個叫「自我決定理論」的框架,說人有三個核心心理需求:自主感,就是感覺自己的行為是自己選的;勝任感,感覺自己在某件事上有能力在進步;還有連結感,感覺跟某件有意義的事或某些人是有連結的。
很多人發展副業,是因為正職滿足不了這三個需求的某一個。工作沒有自主感、感覺不到成長、每天面對的都是冷冰冰的流程。斜槓,在一開始,是一種補缺的機制。
---
但問題出在斜槓的「演化」。
一開始,副業是個可以自由嘗試、沒有壓力的空間。你寫文章是因為你想寫,你教課是因為你喜歡那個主題。自主感很高,就算花很多時間也不覺得累,因為這是你選的。
但隨著時間過去,副業開始長出正職的結構:要維持更新頻率因為演算法、要達到收入門檻因為「既然做了就要賺到才值得」、要跟同類型的人比較因為你開始看到別人的數字。
原本帶來自主感的事,變成外部驅動的任務。你不是「想寫」,你是「必須寫」。自主感消失了,事情卻變多了。難怪更累。
---
不同動機的斜槓,累的方式也不太一樣。
以「逃離」為動機的人,正職太壓抑,副業是出口。初期很有活力,但如果正職的問題沒有解決,副業的活力會慢慢被消耗掉,兩邊都變成壓力。
以「賺錢」為目標的人,動機明確,也比較容易設邊界——達標就好。但如果收入一直沒有達標,挫折感會不斷累積。
以「自我實現」出發的人,最難維持,但也最可能帶來真實滿足感。因為自我實現很難有明確的完成點,容易無限擴張;但如果真的在走自己想走的路,那種意義感可以撐過很多疲憊。
---
怎麼判斷你的斜槓出了什麼問題?問自己幾個問題。
如果副業完全不賺錢,你還願意做嗎?不願意的話,它本質上是第二份工作,你需要用對待工作的方式管理它,設邊界、給自己休息、不要無限投入。
做完之後,你是充電還是更耗電?如果每次做完都更空,那這個形式可能已經不對了。
你有多久沒有在副業裡「玩」了?玩的感覺消失,往往是義務感取代樂趣的信號。
---
最後一個可能違反生產力文化、但很重要的提醒——
副業不一定要賺錢,也不一定要有成果。
如果你發展副業,是因為正職裡有什麼找不到,那副業的功能就是補那個缺口,不是另一個賺錢機器。補缺口的方式很多:寫一個只有自己看的部落格、固定參加一個興趣社群、學一個跟工作完全無關的技能。不需要 YouTube 頻道,不需要接案收入。
重要的是那個空間,有沒有在幫你維持一個比工作更完整的自己。
---
總結三件事。
第一,斜槓的疲憊,通常不是副業太多,而是副業在不知不覺中從自由的空間,變成另一個必須完成的任務。
第二,解法不一定是放棄,而是回頭問:你當初為什麼要開始?那個答案還成立嗎?
第三,如果答案不成立了,不代表失敗,代表你需要讓它休息,或者讓它長成不一樣的東西。
Tags
Related Articles
Why 'Going to Work' Can Ruin You — and How to Protect Yourself in a Dysfunctional Organization
A bad work environment can drain you before you realize it's happening — not because you're not trying hard enough, but because you're pouring energy into a bucket with a hole in it.
Anti-Involution vs. Lobster Anxiety: Why Young People Feel So Torn
The desire to escape pointless competition and the fear of falling behind aren't opposites — they're two sides of the same anxiety.
Why People Who Think Too Far Ahead Are Prone to Nihilism — And How to Recalibrate
Thinking long-term is a strength — until you apply a cosmic time scale to every small daily action, making everything feel meaningless